My story in brief - abuse of power
On my own I am
powerless:
Washing
one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless
means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral.
Paulo Freire
Paulo Freire
About me and my blog
In 1974 I achieved my childhood
ambition and became a teacher in UK schools. Since then I have had a
number of roles, in the latter years specialising in early years and
children with additional support needs. I have positive records and
references from all of my posts. I produced these for the Tribunal
Hearing.
In April 2004 I was appointed an an
advisory teacher for West Sussex County Council ( WSCC). From that
date until March 2009 my 'Individual Development Records' were
positive and I had good feedback from managers and our service users.
This turned from the point that I
reported bullying in the workplace. I requested that the word
'bullying' was not repeated as I knew it would be emotive and make
conciliation more difficult.
I tried to resolve this informally but
was not given any support, so I followed the advice given to me and
initiated a grievance, in accordance with the WSCC policy which was
part of my contract of employment.
The basic facts are:
The grievance procedure took nine
months, and throughout that time the bullying escalated to include
'People Management.' I have a record of the incidences, which I
reported to People Management and ultimately to the correct
'reporting officer' appointed to listen to my concerns under the WSCC
'confidential reporting policy.' My disclosure to this officer was
not kept confidential, and some four months later it was used in an
allegation against me at dismissal level.
Even if the officer believed I had no
cause, I had the right to have it acknowledged, kept confidential and
investigated, not turned against me and used to dismiss me.
I was summarily suspended one day
after the grievance procedure was completed. The recommendation from
the councillors at the final stage was for 'mediation from qualified
personnel' as soon as practicable. There is a record of myself and
the managers involved in the grievance asking for mediation,
throughout the process and in the final grievance hearing. This was
ignored, making a sham of the whole grievance procedure. This was
just one of the points I brought to the attention of the reporting
officer.
I was suspended from March 2009 to my
dismissal on 10th December 2009. I continued asking for details of
the two initial vague allegations, but was not given a response,
apart from ' you will be supported on your return to work.'
The next shock was in May 2009. I was
offered a compromise agreement to leave, with a threat that I 'may be
dismissed.' I have been told by lawyers to 'leave my feelings out of
it', but I felt like I had been punched in the stomach. I still did
not know what I was supposed to have done wrong to warrant dismissal.
This was closely followed by an offer of redundancy, even though we
were still recruiting in my department.
The evidence I produced to defend the
allegations was ignored. I have explained in my witness statement for
the tribunal hearing that the evidence collated by the investigating
officer does not support her accusations. In fact it is quite the
opposite, they show that I was innocent. The intention was to dismiss
me, and the reason was that I had taken out grievances, which were
essentially disclosures about bullying and then made a confidential
disclosure under the WSCC 'whistle blowing' policy.
I believe that any reasonable person
would agree with me that the disciplinary, to put it in simple terms,
was a kangaroo court. Again the WSCC policy was not followed.
This abuse of power has continued
through to the tribunal procedures. No reasons have been given for
the decisions, just blank denials and unsubstantiated accusations.
The evidence I presented was not acknowledged. My witness statement
was ignored. The latest accusation is that I am being vexatious,
simply for appealing a decision. No other reason has been given.
In the final tribunal hearing the
respondent and the judge referred to minor misunderstandings with our
service users that had been resolved years previously. These were all
regarding misapprehensions about my brief. I found myself defending
'requests for an alternative visitor' which the Judge would only
allow me to describe as 'complaints.' There are no records of such
complaints. Within the folders of evidence produced for the tribunal
hearing, there are records of these issues being resolved, including
thanks from my line managers for doing so. The judge told me that it
was not necessary for me to find these.
My identity, my vocation and my
livelihood have been taken away from me. I did nothing wrong. I am
now virtually unemployable.
There are strict time limits on
Tribunal procedures but there are no time limits for telling my
story. I am telling the truth and have documentation to back up all
of the facts I will present. I am asserting my right to freedom of
speech and will not insult or lie about anyone.
QUOTES:
My hope:
“There is a power that can be created
out of pent-up indignation, courage, and the inspiration of a common
cause, and that if enough people put their minds and bodies into that
cause, they can win. It is a phenomenon recorded again and against in
the history of popular movements against injustice all over the
world.”
― Howard Zinn, You Can't Be Neutral on a Moving Train: A Personal History of Our Times
― Howard Zinn, You Can't Be Neutral on a Moving Train: A Personal History of Our Times
I have been told constantly that I
will fail:
The probability that we may fail in the
struggle ought not to deter us from the support of a cause we believe
to be just.
Abraham Lincoln
“I
don't know about you, but I only have one life, and I don't want to
spend it in a sewer of injustice.”
― Wallace Shawn
― Wallace Shawn
― William Faulkner, Intruder in the Dust
No comments:
Post a Comment